Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bolton v. SE Property Holdings, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 2013No. 1D13-643Published

1DissentRowe, J.

Because the process outlined in State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999), was not required before the trial court could impose a limitation on the Boltons’ right to appear before the court, I respectfully dissent.

In 2005, the Boltons received a loan from Vision Bank1 (“the bank”) and secured the loan with a mortgage on a lot on Perdido Key in Escambia County. In 2008, the bank filed suit against the Bol-tons after they defaulted on the loan. The Boltons filed a pro se answer to the complaint, which included affirmative defenses and counter-claims. There were many disputes during the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Jackson v. Florida Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Spencer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Delgado v. HearnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API