Legal Opinion
Stengel v. Clarence Materials Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1988No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff, seeking recovery for personal injuries allegedly sustained by him, commenced two separate actions; the first against defendant Empire Builders Supply Co. and others; the second against defendant Mack Trucks. These actions were consolidated by the court. Subsequently, Mack Trucks moved to amend its answer to add cross claims against Empire and others for contribution. The court denied this motion. Mack Trucks appeals from this order.
Thereafter, Mack Trucks commenced a third-party action against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnston Products Corp. v. ATI, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- D'Onofrio v. St. Joseph's Hospital Health CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Power Test Petroleum Distributors, Inc. v. Northville Industries Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Battipaglia v. BarlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Leavitt v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ward v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Schafer v. AlbroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Lake v. John W. Cowper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998