Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Roberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1948PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

A candidate for public office has a justiciable interest in the regularity of the public proceedings antecedent to the election as well as in the election itself. By appropriate proceedings he may see to it that the processes prescribed by law for the election are carried out conformably with the statutory direction. This would include the important right to require that candidates who are nominated against him, by whatever means, are placed upon the official ballots according to law.

His rights are so closely related to the subject matter that if subdivision 2 of section 330 of the Election…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Daley v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Matter of YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Iserman v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Matter of YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Matter of YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Amsterdam City Hospital v. GemmitiNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Fleishman v. Board of ElectionsNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Becker v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Dillon v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Dyte v. LawleyNew York Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API