Legal Opinion

Foreman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1911No. 919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was convicted of rape upon a girl under fifteen years of age, his punishment being assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.

It is a conceded fact that appellant had intercourse with the girl. It is a conceded fact that she gave birth to a child on the 30th of December, 1907. The girl testified that appellant engaged in two acts of intercourse with her, one in 1905, and the other subsequently. The indictment was returned against appellant in the latter part of January, 1908. The girl also testified that the last act of intercourse was seven or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Bader v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Knowles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Pridemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lusty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Battles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Hale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API