Legal Opinion
Higginbotham v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 23, 1969No. 2552PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam 1
Habeas corpus denied.
WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
ON PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam 2
By a per curiam decision without opinion filed April 23, 1969, we denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein petitioner had sought to obtain delayed appellate review under the authority of Hollingshead v. Wainwright, Fla.1967, 194 So.2d 577. Respondents now seek clarification of whether our decision was on the merits of the appeal or solely on the right of petitioner to utilize habeas corpus to obtain delayed appellate review. In the instant case the request for clarification is valid…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Aubrey Pate v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Hollingshead v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Leroy King v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Kinsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Pierson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- McMaster v. PurdyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973