Estate of Rieman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
Appellants seek to have the judgment, which allowed the final account and provided for the discharge of the administrator, vacated and set aside. They submit that they are entitled to a direction from this court to the trial court to set aside the sale and conveyance of the real estate made by the Illinois executor.
The appeal is solely from the judgment approving the administrator’s account and discharging him from further responsibility in the proceedings. No appeal was taken from the order refusing permission to the administrator to sell the real estate. The appeal from the judgment does…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. BillsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Flood v. PilgrimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Marsh v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Riedi v. HeinzlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- McManany v. SheridanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Estate of KingseedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Galster v. First National Bank of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Riling v. CainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Area Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult Education, District No. 2 v. SaltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. BischoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.