Legal Opinion
AHMED v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 10, 2021No. 2:20-cv-05399Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MOHAMMED AHMED, : Plaintiff : : v. : CIVIL ACTION : Commissioner of Social Security, : 20-5399 Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Timothy R. Rice September 10, 2021 U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Mohammed Ahmed, proceeding pro se,1 alleges his lawyer failed to fully and fairly develop his evidentiary record before the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing, which resulted in an erroneous denial of his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB). See Pl. Br. (doc. 16).2 He requests that I “order additional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Stephen R. VENTURA v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services. Stephen Ventura, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Sharon Bingham Matthews v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Roell v. WithrowSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.