Legal Opinion

State v. Oakley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2001No. 99-3328-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJon P. Wilcox, J.

¶ 1. This case presents two issues.1 First, we must decide whether as a condition of *452probation, a father of nine children, who has intentionally refused to pay child support, can be required to avoid having another child, unless he shows that he can support that child and his current children. We conclude that in light of Oakley's ongoing victimization of his nine children and extraordinarily troubling record manifesting his disregard for the law, this anomalous condition — imposed on a convicted felon facing the far more restrictive and punitive sanction of prison — is not overly broad and…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. TaltyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. RowanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API