Legal Opinion

Prater v. Baughman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1919No. 10443PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Reid. March 8, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

The failure of an executory consideration in a promissory note is not a defense against a purchaser for value before maturity who had knowledge of the character of the consideration but who acquired the note before the consideration had actually failed, and who had no notice, constructive or otherwise, that the consideration would fail. Simmons v. Council, 5 Ga. App. 286 (63 S. E. 238); Whitten v. Railway Postal Clerks’ Investment Asso., 16 Ga. App. 685 (85 S. E. 973); Turner Lumber Co. v. Henderson Co., 20 Ga. App. 682, 689 (93 S. E. 301), and authorities cited. In the instant case no facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Adams v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Smith v. City of ElbertonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Turner Lumber Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Whitten v. Railway Postal Clerks Investment Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. State Banking Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API