Harms v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hardin District Oowrt. Action in chancery to enforce the alleged rights of plaintiff to redeem certain land, claimed by her as a homestead, from a sheriff’s.sale made upon a decree foreclosing a mortgage. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
— I. No question arises in the case. which requires a statement of the pleadings. There is no dispute as to the facts which are all set out in an agreed statement, upon which the case was tried in the court below.' They are as follows:
Plaintiff’s husband, Hiram S. Harms, purchased of defendant, Palmer, certain lands, and executed a mortgage thereon to secure seven promissory notes given for the purchase ¡money of the property. The notes were due at ’different dates, and each provided for annual interest, and that the principal of the note became due upon default in payment of the interest.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clayton v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Poweshiek County v. DennisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Escher v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Todd v. DaveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Blake v. BlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Wells v. OrdwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Cadd v. SnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Dahlstrom v. UnknownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Herrick v. TallmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888