Citizens Telephone Co. v. City of Newport
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting opinion of
Chief Justice Cabboll.
I must dissent from the opinion because I am thoroughly convinced that the court by misconstruction of the contract between the city of Newport and the telephone company has relieved the telephone company of a material obligation that it voluntarily entered into a contract with the city to perform, and has put on users of telephones in the city a burden in the way of an extra telephone fee they should not be required to bear. I think I will be able to show, in the most convincing way, the correctness of my position, not only by the very letter of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- District of Columbia v. GallaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bates Machine Co. v. Norton Iron WorksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Rural Home Tel'p Co. v. Ky. & Ind. Tel'p Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.