Legal Opinion

Rublee v. Belmont

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanley, J.

The legal principle governing the first point of the case was fully slated in the general instructions. Each party had an opportunity in argument to apply it to his view of the facts, and it was not error of law for the court to refuse to give instructions on its application to particular evidence. P. M. L. Ins. Co. v. Clark, 59 N. H. 345; Fogg v. Moulton, 59 N. H. 499; Ordway v. Sanders, 58 N. H. 132; Spalding v. Brooks, 58 N. H. 224; White v. Jordan, 27 Me. 370; Johnson v. Knowlton, 35 Me. 467; Sawyer v. Steamboat Co., 46 Me. 400; Darby v. Hayford, 56 Me. 246; Thornton v. Thornton, 39 Vt.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thornton's Executors v. Thornton's HeirsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  2. White v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1847
  3. Durgin v. Town of DanvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
  4. Whitcomb v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  5. Darby v. HayfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colby v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. Piper v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  3. Minot v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API