Hanover Insurance Co. v. Crocker
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
[¶ 1] Hanover Insurance Co. appeals from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Marden J.) in favor of Ngoclien Thi Crocker and Mary Crocker on Hanover’s complaint requesting a declaration that Hanover has no obligation to defend or indemnify Ngoclien in connection with a civil action brought by Mary against Ngoclien. On appeal, Hanover contends that it has no duty to defend or indemnify because 1) the allegations against Ngoclien do not constitute an “occurrence” under the insurance policy, 2) the policy’s exclusion for injuries expected or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Unigard Mutual Insurance v. Spokane School District No. 81Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State Mutual Insurance v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. LebrechtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- CACI International, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Brumley v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Home Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- No. 97-1282Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.