Legal Opinion
Booker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 26, 2002No. 1D01-1433PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarfield, J.
Because appellant was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se motion, it was a nullity. See Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Beverly v. State, 516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). See also, Jackson v. State, 767 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Fla.2000); Burke v. State, 732 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The trial court therefore properly dismissed the motion.
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Beverly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Burke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Rodriguez v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Clifton Cornelius v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017