Legal Opinion

Williamson Law Book Co. v. Midland National Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The defendant is a foreign corporation. The verification of the answer was made in this State by the secretary and treasurer of the corporation and the answer was returned as insufficient. Judgment was entered as in default and this motion is to open the default.

The verification is sufficient. It was made in this State by an officer of the corporation. It might have been made by an agent or attorney having personal knowledge of the material facts. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 99.) That rule provides that the verification of a foreign corporation “ may ” be made in that way. It does not exclude a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Ecuador Development Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. American Audit Co. v. Industrial Federation of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Henry v. Brooklyn Heights River Railroad, New York County Courts1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API