Legal Opinion

Attorney General Ex Rel. Judges of Recorder's Court v. Judge of Recorder's Court

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1930No. Calendar 34,951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Under Act No. 369, Pub. Acts 1919 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, §§ 14725 [1]-14725 [15]), the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit was expanded. Attorney General v. Lindsay, 221 Mich. 533. The court took over the work of the police courts, which were abolished, so that all the criminal jurisdiction in the city was centered in the one court. The act was amended by Act No. 278, Pub. Aets 1929, providing, after favorable referendum, for the establishment of the traffic and ordinance division of the court. This is a friendly suit to determine whether that division may obtain its jurors from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Cotter v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guaranty Development Co. v. Circle Paving Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API