District of Columbia v. Stone
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellant, the District of Columbia, appeals from an adverse verdict and judgment for damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee Stone. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case on the ground that the notice given by appellee was not legally sufficient to meet the requirements of the District statute which provides:
“No action shall be maintained against the District of Columbia for unliquidated damages to person . or property unless the claimant within six months after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Barribeau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Cook v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Charles B. McDonald v. The Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956