Legal Opinion

Handy Andy, Inc. v. Rademacher

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 25, 1984No. 04-81-00468-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Justice.

This appeal concerns an oral employment contract terminable at the will of either party and a bonus incentive plan. The appellant (employer), challenges the jury findings and the consequent judgment awarding recovery to the appellee (employee), of the bonus which accrued during his employment but payable after the termination of his employment.

Appellee went to work for the appellant in 1977. He was, at that time, shown an instrument styled BONUS INCENTIVE PLAN FOR STORE MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL which, in pertinent part states:

4. Bonuses are paid annually at the end of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Miller v. Riata Cadillac CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Marvin Turner Engineers v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gamble v. Gregg County, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  2. Enstar Corp. v. Bass, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1987
  3. Paul Lewis v. Vitol, S.A. Vitol, S.A., Inc. And Miguel Loya, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API