South Dakota Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of petitioner’s petition for rehearing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.
*317STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners seek rehearing1 on the theory that the court’s opinion violates the principle of SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 196, 67 S.Ct. 1575, 1577, 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947), that courts may judge the propriety of an administrative agency’s act “solely by the grounds invoked by the agency.” Specifically, the argument is that FERC purported to decide the application of area rate clauses to NGPA ceilings on the basis of the actual,…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
4Cited by1 opinion
- South Dakota Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991