Legal Opinion

State v. Sianez

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1968No. 1846PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFARLAND, Chief Justice:

Two informations were filed against defendant-appellant, Manuel Duran Sianez, each charging him with the crime of forgery on a different date. The two cases were consolidated for trial, and defendant was found guilty of both crimes. He was given a sentence of ten years to ten years and one day on each, the sentences to run concurrently.

The evidence showed that some Travelers Express money orders had been stolen from the locked store of James Wiltshire, in Indio, California, and that, before the theft, the money orders were blank. James Stuard, a State witness,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. People v. MathisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GrijalvaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. State v. CelayaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. State v. BloomArizona Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API