Legal Opinion

Benz v. Burrows

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred by granting defendant Watkins’ motion to dismiss the complaint after opening statements at trial. Motions to dismiss at that stage of the litigation are strongly disfavored and should not be granted "unless it is obvious that under no circumstances, and under no view of the testimony to be adduced, can plaintiff prevail” (Jurewicz v Lucarelli, 77 AD2d 751, 752; see also, De Vito v Katsch, 157 AD2d 413, 416-417; DiPasquale v Baker-Roos, Inc., 156 AD2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Kidd v. HavensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Bonwell v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Jurewicz v. LucarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API