Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Shong-Ching Tong

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 2, 1979No. 3030-3Published

1DissentMcInturff, J.

(dissenting) — What purpose is served by denying Mr. Tong his day in court because he did not know how to proceed? From the record and briefs, it is apparent Mr. Tong has brought this appeal in vindication of principle and not to avoid paying a $10 traffic fine.2 He genuinely believes he is not guilty.

Mr. Tong pleaded not guilty in district court to a speeding charge but was convicted after a bench trial. He then filed a notice of appeal with the Superior Court and posted an appeal bond of $100. Mr. Tong was advised by the district court that the case transcript had been filed in Superior…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Goldendale v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Goldendale v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. State v. Berg's Economy Sales & ServiceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API