Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Warner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2006No. 04-FM-175Published

1ConcurrenceSchwelb, Senior Judge

The law, in its majestic equality, fobbids THE RICH AS WELL AS THE POOR TO SLEEP UNDER BRIDGES, TO BEG IN THE STREETS, AND TO STEAL BREAD.

Anatole France, Le Lys Rouge, ch. 7 (1894).

I

I concur in the judgment and, for the most part, in the opinion of the court. I write separately, however, because cases like this one implicate the liberty of the citizen and present a significant risk that a non-custodial parent will face imprisonment on account of poverty. The statute on which the court bases its affirmance of the judgment provides that knowing nonpayment of child support is prima facie…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. PomponioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API