Legal Opinion · Dissent

Travelers Insurance Co. v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 1980No. Nos. 56563, 56789 and 56591Published

1DissentAlderman, Justice

I dissent from the approval of the decision of the district court in Rodriguez v. Travelers Insurance Co. because I disagree with the district court’s holding that under *344former section 627.736(3)(b), providing for equitable distribution of personal injury protection benefits, attorney’s fees must be awarded when statutory prerequisites are met regardless of whether or not the insurance company has acted in bad faith. Rather, I agree with the view announced by the District Court of Appeal, First District, in Catches v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 318 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Catches v. Government Employees Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Reliance Insurance Companies v. KilbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API