Legal Opinion
People v. Boucher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*598The defendant’s contention that a detective’s entry into his apartment was unlawful is unpreserved for appellate review to the extent that the defendant now argues that his consent to the entry was not voluntary (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Jones, 48 AD3d 1116, 1116 [2008], affd 11 NY3d 822 [2008]; People v Philips, 30 AD3d 618, 619 [2006]). In any event, any error in failing to suppress the physical evidence seized from the defendant’s apartment was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence of the defendant’s guilt, without reference to the alleged error, was overwhelming, and there…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. ChiddickNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ChrisostomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. DeSantisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DeSantisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013