Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Hatch

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The defendants demur to the complaint, and specify as the grounds of demurrer that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleged that the defendants were the promoters of the organization of a mining corporation, called the Dunderberg Mining Company, and obtained from the plaintiffs and others subscriptions to the capital stock of the proposed corporation. By the terms of the subscription it was stated that the corporation was about to be organized for the purpose, among other things, of acquiring title to certain mines or lodes situate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Greaves v. . GougeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Heath v. Erie Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1871
  4. Blake v. . Buffalo Creek R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Greaves v. GougeNew York Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. ScofieldNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Attorney-General v. Continental Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Brewster v. HatchNew York Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API