Wyhopen v. Via

DANAHY, Judge.

When this case was first before us, we reversed an order which dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint against the defendants seeking cancellation of a deed between defendants Via and Harding,1 specific performance of a lease agreement providing for right of first refusal to purchase the leased premises,2 and damages for tortious interference with contractual rights. Why open [sic] v. Via, 404 So.2d 851 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

On remand, the trial court correctly tried the remaining issue to determine what price and terms would be “equal to” those contained in the Via-Harding contract to…