Ramatowski v. Ramatowski
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
With commendable frankness counsel for defendant, the appellant, have voluntarily raised the question of whether the judgment appealed from in this case is a final and appealable judgment. They conclude that it is, a decision with which, regretably, we cannot agree.
Plaintiff and defendant are wife and husband. Plaintiff began the suit by filing a petition for a divorce, to which defendant initially responded by filing an answer and cross-bill in which he sought the divorce. Subsequently, defendant filed an amended cross-bill in which he alleged that at the time the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Readenour v. Motors Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. Great Heritage Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Paulus v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Schumacher v. Sheahan Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Clay Wideman & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975