Legal Opinion

Ramatowski v. Ramatowski

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1967No. 32551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

With commendable frankness counsel for defendant, the appellant, have voluntarily raised the question of whether the judgment appealed from in this case is a final and appealable judgment. They conclude that it is, a decision with which, regretably, we cannot agree.

Plaintiff and defendant are wife and husband. Plaintiff began the suit by filing a petition for a divorce, to which defendant initially responded by filing an answer and cross-bill in which he sought the divorce. Subsequently, defendant filed an amended cross-bill in which he alleged that at the time the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Readenour v. Motors Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Great Heritage Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Paulus v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Schumacher v. Sheahan Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Clay Wideman & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API