Legal Opinion

Spence v. Downham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1967No. 20,548PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaulconer, J.

— Appellee sued appellant for damages for injuries which he sustained as a result of appellee’s motorcycle colliding with appellant’s automobile. The jury returned a verdict for appellee and judgment was entered thereon. Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled, which is the error assigned on this appeal.

Only those specifications in appellant’s motion for new trial, argued in his brief, will be considered. Rule 2-17 (e) and (f), Rules of the Supreme Court, 1964 Revision; Gernhart v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 470, 472, 120 N. E. 2d 265.

Appellant first argues that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Gernhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Midwest Oil Company, Inc. v. StoreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Macbeth Evans Glass Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Interstate Public Service Co. v. Moore, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Milby v. MearsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  2. State v. EdgmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Davis v. SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Knudsen v. Arlington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API