Legal Opinion

Cahn-Coblens Co. v. Eisenberg

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided July 13, 1922Published

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

As was said at the conclusion of the argument in this case, however desirable it may be that there be a re-examination of the question of the applicability of the ground rent redemption statutes to leases for the mere occupation of buildings, that re-examination should not be made by the judge of the lower court. The only question open to discussion here is whether the rule oí Brager vs. Bingham, 127 Md. 148, is to be applied so as to require a redemption in the situation in which these parties stand. I have had the benefit of unusually able arguments on this, with many references to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prince De Bearn v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Benson v. MarkoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Banks v. HaskieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  4. Stewart v. GorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Gutowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API