Kidder v. Tufts
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Assumpsit- for money lent. - The parties are residents of Massachusetts and were so when-plaintiffs’-cause of action - accrued,-which is for' money loaned by plaintiffs 'to defendant, no place of payment being fixed by the parties, and the contract being made in Massachusetts.
Read the full summary
Assumpsit- for money lent. - The parties are residents of Massachusetts and were so when-plaintiffs’-cause of action - accrued,-which is for' money loaned by plaintiffs 'to defendant, no place of payment being fixed by the parties, and the contract being made in Massachusetts. Upon plaintiffs’ writ, personal property of defendant in this State was attached April 3, 1866 ; writ dated April 2, 1866. At the October, term, 1866, the Cheshire National Bank, a corporation located at Keene, N. H., and Daniel B. Pond, a citizen of Rhode Island, had leave to appear as subsequent attaching creditors.…
1Opinion of the CourtNesmith, J.
The Cheshire National Bank in Keene, and Pond a citizen resident .in Rhode Island, as creditors of the defendant, having made their attachment, subsequently, in point of time, to the plaintiffs, of certain personal property, situate in this county, now request this court to continue plaintiffs’ suit, to enable the defendant to procure his discharge in insolvency in Massachusetts, so that it may be interposed here as a plea for their benefit, in bar of plaintiffs’ action. This question is addressed to the discretion of the court and admitted to be not of right, and, as a question of practice,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Crippen v. RogersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892