Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 5, 1966No. [App. No. 139, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

243 Md. 688 (1966)

221 A.2d 83

BREWSTER

v.

WARDEN OF THE MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 139, September Term, 1965.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 5, 1966.

Before HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER and BARNES, JJ.

2Per curiam

Application denied for the reasons stated by Judge Harold E. Naughton in his opinion in the lower court.

The applicant, Randolph Brewster, claimed in one of his contentions that his confession was illegally elicited and could not be used against him at his trial, because he was "denied the assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution." The…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hyde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Isaacs v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Brewster v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Cherrix v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Tiller v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API