Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Wisconsin Department of Justice v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2015No. 2013AP001488Published

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 62. The Wisconsin Legislature recognized the important role of whistleblowers in maintaining accountable government. The legislative purpose of the statute is expressly declared: "It is the policy of this state to encourage disclosure of information . . . and to ensure that any employee employed by a governmental unit is protected from retaliatory action for disclosing information .. ." Wis. Stat. § 230.01(2).

¶ 63. Employees are encouraged to disclose information, including a violation of any law or regulation and any mismanagement or substantial waste of public funds. Wis. Stat. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Salazar v. Ramah Navajo ChapterSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Dolan v. Continental Airlines/Continental ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API