Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Griggs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1965No. Calendar 70-74, Docket 50,094-50,098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The jury rendered a no cause verdict in the case of each of the five plaintiffs. Prom an order denying new trial, plaintiffs have appealed. In a written opinion giving his reasons for denying a new trial, the learned circuit judge conceded that one of the special .questions propounded by him to the jury was erroneous in that it contained a “mixed law and fact proposition.” Plaintiffs had argued this as one of several grounds for new trial. Despite' the erroneous instruction, the circuit judge held that plaintiffs were not entitled to a new trial because-under the Ontario law, 1 plaintiff Owen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wingert v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Turner v. St. Clair Tunnel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rick v. Saginaw Bay Towing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Jonescu v. OrlichMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abendschein v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Farrell v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Farrell v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API