Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Puckett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1924No. 14769PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

There is no merit in the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

The verdict is approved by the trial judge, and we cannot say that there is no evidence to support it. In Rogers v. State, 101 Ga. 562, 563 (28 S. E. 978), Justice Cobb said: “Applications for new trials on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to evidence are addressed to a sound legal discretion to be exercised by the trial judges. When this discretion has been exercised and tffe motion for a new trial overruled, this court will not interfere where there is any evidence which would justify the jury in reaching…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API