Legal Opinion

Emilio v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 2003No. A03A1489PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

In the second appearance of this case, Ricardo C. Emilio appeals his conviction on one count of trafficking in amphetamine, contending that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. As the record reveals that trial counsel’s admission of bad character evidence was deficient performance, and that there is a reasonable probability that such deficiency prejudiced Emilio’s defense, we reverse.

In a prior opinion, we affirmed Emilio’s conviction, but remanded the case for a hearing on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Emilio v. State, 257 Ga. App. 49, 53 (570…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gearin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Emilio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Sydenstricker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bledsoe v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Farris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Farris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Whitaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Vann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API