Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Thouron
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS PROM THE OIECUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.' Motions to dismiss^ for^ want of jurisdiction. The case is stated in the opinion. ,
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
These are appeals from orders of the Circuit Court remanding the above-entitled cases to the state ■ court, which appeals the records show wére “ granted under the ■ provisions of the act-of February 25, 1889, on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the cause.”
Before the act of 1875, c. 137,18 Stat. 470, we held that an order by the Circuit Court remanding a cause was not such a final judgment or decree in a civil action as to give us jurisdiction for its review by writ of error or appeal. The appro-. priate remedy in such a case was then, by mandamus, to compel the Circuit Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graves v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Railroad Co. v. WiswallSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Babbitt v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Morey v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Turner v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gurnee v. Patrick CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- German National Bank v. SpeckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cole v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
- Joy v. Adelbert CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.