Legal Opinion

State v. Berosik

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1999No. 98-464PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶ 1 Appellant Darwin Berosik (Berosik) appeals from the judgment and conviction of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County.

¶2 We affirm.

¶3 The following issues are raised on appeal:

¶4 1. Whether the District Court erred in denying Berosik’s motion for mistrial.

¶5 2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion in admitting a police booking form.

Standard of Review

¶6 We review a district court’s denial of a motion for mistrial to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. State v. Partin (1997), 287 Mont. 12, 951 P.2d 1002. We review evidentiary rulings to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. PartinMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HuertaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GravesMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re the Seizure of $23,691.00 in United States CurrencyMontana Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. KutlakSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. State v. MinerMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Missoula v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BradyMontana Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API