State v. Berosik
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶ 1 Appellant Darwin Berosik (Berosik) appeals from the judgment and conviction of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County.
¶2 We affirm.
¶3 The following issues are raised on appeal:
¶4 1. Whether the District Court erred in denying Berosik’s motion for mistrial.
¶5 2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion in admitting a police booking form.
Standard of Review
¶6 We review a district court’s denial of a motion for mistrial to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. State v. Partin (1997), 287 Mont. 12, 951 P.2d 1002. We review evidentiary rulings to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. PartinMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HuertaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GravesMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re the Seizure of $23,691.00 in United States CurrencyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. KutlakSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- State v. MinerMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Missoula v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BradyMontana Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.