Legal Opinion

(PS) Tapia v. The Boeing Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 12, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02218Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICARDO TAPIA, No. 2:20-cv-02218-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THE BOEING COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 18 Eastern District of California Local Rules (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(3). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 19 On March 10, 2021, the court heard defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to 20 state a claim, for improper venue, and for other relief. Plaintiff appeared pro se at the hearing; 21…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned MediaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API