Legal Opinion

Ballantyne v. Parriott

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1961No. 34948PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an automobile damage suit for personal injuries growing out of an intersection collision. The jury returned a verdict aganst each party on his affirmative demands. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff alleges four assignments of error. The first two assignments of error, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence, are not discussed in the brief, and in accordance with rule 8a2(4), of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 1960, will not be noticed herein.

The third assignment of error is substantially that the court did not instruct the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. O'DELL v. GoodsellNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sorter v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Nebraska City Airport AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Beveridge v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Meyer v. MoellNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lemieux v. SandersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Stevens v. County of DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API