Legal Opinion

Thomas v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1987No. 16555PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Sandra Thomas, the beneficiary under a life insurance policy issued to her former husband, brought a declaratory judgment action to have her former spouse declared legally dead after he had been missing for several years. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company intervened in the action. Sandra then amended her complaint to ask that John Hancock be required to pay her the policy proceeds, interest, certain unearned premiums, costs and attorney fees. The district court generally granted all requested relief but refused to award attorney fees. Sandra has appealed, contending…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Preferred Accident Insurance v. FieldingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Da Rin v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. HighleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API