Legal Opinion
State v. Isaacs
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 10, 1934No. Quo Warranto, No. 2PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reinhardt, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The information and the stipulations filed in this case disclose fully the contentions of the parties.
The question before the Court is, who is entitled to hold the office of Receiver of Taxes and County Treasurer for Sussex County?
John S. Isaacs claims to hold the said office by virtue of an appointment of the Governor made June 13, 1933, to fill a vacancy then existing in said office.
John B. Rogers claims to hold said office as a result of his election thereto at a general election held in Sussex County in the Fall of 1932 and because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Loeb v. Columbia Township TrusteesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Berea College v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Carey v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SchorrSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- State v. EmersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- State v. ShawSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
- Reese v. HartnettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.