Rodriquez v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The appellants entered pleas of not guilty before the court after waiving a jury to the offense of possession of marihuana. The court found them guilty and assessed punishment at three years and a fine of five hundred dollars for each appellant. Imposition of the sentences was suspended and probation granted. This appeal is taken from those convictions.

The sole ground of error, asserted on behalf of both appellants, is that the evi dence, all of which was stipulated, was insufficient to show they exercised care, custody, control, or management over, and had knowledge of the…