Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Croom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sumter.. Heard before the Hon. A. W. Dillabd. The appellees in this case submitted a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the following grounds: “ 1. Because no security for the costs of the appeal has been given. 2. Because no appeal bond has been given. 3. Because the certificate of the register in the court below fails to certify the names of the sureties for the costs of such appeal.”

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The transcript shows, that the appeal is taken by Mrs. Augusta M. Gere, a married woman, who claims an interest in the property in controversy, under a conveyance from her father, executed since the Code of Alabama was proclaimed as the law of this State, and by Matthew A. Marshall and James B. Marshall. Matthew A. Marshall and James B. Marshall gave security for costs, by instrument in writing in these words, omitting the style of the case : “ We, G. M. Spinks and Caroline Spinks, acknowledge ourselves securities for all the costs of the appeal taken by the said Matthew A. Marshall and James…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Satterwhite v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  2. Riddle v. HannaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. Williams v. McConicoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Crump v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Deslonde v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Mayfield v. Court of County Com. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Baker v. Denniston-Boykin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Dees v. Lindsey Mill Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API