Legal Opinion

United States v. Lopez-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 20, 2020No. 19-2975Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-2975 United States v. Lopez-Hernandez UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Linwood WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Troy Vaval, AKA Justice VavalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API