Paulk v. State

1. The judge of the city court of Baxley was qualified! under the constitution of 1877, to preside in the superior court and try this case, the judge of the latter court being disqualified. Constitution of 1877, art. 6, sec. 5 (Civil Code, § 5851); Paulk v. State, ante (58 S. E. 1108).

2. It is no cause of challenge to the array that twelve of the forty-eight jurors constituting the array had just served as a jury on the trial of a person jointly indicted with the defendant, in which a verdict of guilty was rendered, and that the witnesses and the evidence in the present case would be the same…