Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Goodwin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1845PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The plaintiffs on an allegation that a quantity of curb-stone, imported in their ship, was abandoned by the consignee, obtained a provisional seizure, as a preliminary proceeding to a sale of it for the payment of the freight. The consignee, Geraghty, filed an exception to the suit, denying that the curb-stone had beed abandoned, and contesting the legality of proceeding against it; and, in case the action should be sustained, he claimed in reconvention damages on account of the stone having, through the neglect of the master and sailors, been considerably injured, by being smeared with tar.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watkins Banking Co. v. Louisiana Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. Vincent v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865
  3. Duncan v. WiseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API