Legal Opinion

Water Hammer Arrester Corp. v. Tower

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 3, 1946No. 8900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

By this complaint Water Hammer Arrester Corporation sought a declaratory judgment against the defendant relative to United States patent to Tower, No. 2,273,-766, issüed February 17, 1942, upon an application filed August 4, 1940. The alleged invention covered by the patent relates to a water hammer arrester, or other energy absorbing appliance of the type in which abnormal impulses or fluctuations in pressure of water or other liquid in a pipe or other conduit are suppressed by compression of a gas or other compressible fluid medium to prevent water hammer.

Plaintiff is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Allegheny Steel & Brass Corp. v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Water Hammer Arrester Corp. v. TowerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shell Development Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  4. Gazda v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  5. Nicholson v. Carl W. Mullis Engineering & Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API