Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1948No. 31183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The question for determination is whether the trial court erred in submitting to the jury the con- • sideration of the offense of assault with intent to rob, the subordinate questions being ..whether such offense is an included or inferior offense to armed robbery, and, if so, whether there was substantial evidence of assault with intent to rob.

Section 13448-2, General Code, in part, declares:

“The jury piay find the defendant not guilty of the offense charged, but guilty of an attempt to commit it if such attempt is an offense at law. When the indictment or information charges an offense,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GaugerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Daniel v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API