Murphy v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, P. J.
The plaintiff in error was by information charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, was convicted, and sentenced to* be confined in the county jail for one year. The record was properly saved, and the defendant has appealed to' this court.
The evidence on behalf of the state, in brief, is that the defendant was a married man living in the neighborhood of Enid or Garber, and was working in the oil field; in the afternoon before the trouble the next morning, the defendant was going to Garber and met Thomas H. Con-yers in a car accompanied by the defendant’s wife. It is shown the defendant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
- Ex Parte MurphyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938